header-logo header-logo

Coroners, coronavirus & controversy

17 June 2020 / David Regan
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Opinion , Coronial law , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
22801
The investigation of many individual COVID-19 deaths is likely to give rise to significant controversy, says David Regan

With news that civil actions against the Department for Health and Social Care have already been commenced arising from its management of the response to the coronavirus, the investigation of many individual COVID-19 deaths is likely to give rise to significant controversy. A large proportion of the work in England and Wales falls upon the Coroners’ Service, which has been ably assisted by clear, well-reasoned and helpful guidance provided by the chief coroner.However, identifying which COVID 19 deaths are unnatural—and thus require coronial investigation and inquest—is not straightforward. It is likely to give rise to a number of challenges.

Deaths caused by exposure in work give rise to the greatest difficulty. Clinicians and care workers have already died of the disease. When deciding whether or not she has a duty to investigate, a coroner must do so if she has reason to suspect that the death was contributed to by some human error.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll