header-logo header-logo

17 June 2020 / David Regan
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Opinion , Coronial law , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Coroners, coronavirus & controversy

22801
The investigation of many individual COVID-19 deaths is likely to give rise to significant controversy, says David Regan

With news that civil actions against the Department for Health and Social Care have already been commenced arising from its management of the response to the coronavirus, the investigation of many individual COVID-19 deaths is likely to give rise to significant controversy. A large proportion of the work in England and Wales falls upon the Coroners’ Service, which has been ably assisted by clear, well-reasoned and helpful guidance provided by the chief coroner.However, identifying which COVID 19 deaths are unnatural—and thus require coronial investigation and inquest—is not straightforward. It is likely to give rise to a number of challenges.

Deaths caused by exposure in work give rise to the greatest difficulty. Clinicians and care workers have already died of the disease. When deciding whether or not she has a duty to investigate, a coroner must do so if she has reason to suspect that the death was contributed to by some human error.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll