header-logo header-logo

Coroners, coronavirus & controversy

17 June 2020 / David Regan
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Opinion , Coronial law , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
22801
The investigation of many individual COVID-19 deaths is likely to give rise to significant controversy, says David Regan

With news that civil actions against the Department for Health and Social Care have already been commenced arising from its management of the response to the coronavirus, the investigation of many individual COVID-19 deaths is likely to give rise to significant controversy. A large proportion of the work in England and Wales falls upon the Coroners’ Service, which has been ably assisted by clear, well-reasoned and helpful guidance provided by the chief coroner.However, identifying which COVID 19 deaths are unnatural—and thus require coronial investigation and inquest—is not straightforward. It is likely to give rise to a number of challenges.

Deaths caused by exposure in work give rise to the greatest difficulty. Clinicians and care workers have already died of the disease. When deciding whether or not she has a duty to investigate, a coroner must do so if she has reason to suspect that the death was contributed to by some human error.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll