header-logo header-logo

Coroners, coronavirus & controversy

17 June 2020 / David Regan
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Opinion , Coronial law , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
22801
The investigation of many individual COVID-19 deaths is likely to give rise to significant controversy, says David Regan

With news that civil actions against the Department for Health and Social Care have already been commenced arising from its management of the response to the coronavirus, the investigation of many individual COVID-19 deaths is likely to give rise to significant controversy. A large proportion of the work in England and Wales falls upon the Coroners’ Service, which has been ably assisted by clear, well-reasoned and helpful guidance provided by the chief coroner.However, identifying which COVID 19 deaths are unnatural—and thus require coronial investigation and inquest—is not straightforward. It is likely to give rise to a number of challenges.

Deaths caused by exposure in work give rise to the greatest difficulty. Clinicians and care workers have already died of the disease. When deciding whether or not she has a duty to investigate, a coroner must do so if she has reason to suspect that the death was contributed to by some human error.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll