header-logo header-logo

17 June 2020 / David Regan
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Opinion , Coronial law , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Coroners, coronavirus & controversy

22801
The investigation of many individual COVID-19 deaths is likely to give rise to significant controversy, says David Regan

With news that civil actions against the Department for Health and Social Care have already been commenced arising from its management of the response to the coronavirus, the investigation of many individual COVID-19 deaths is likely to give rise to significant controversy. A large proportion of the work in England and Wales falls upon the Coroners’ Service, which has been ably assisted by clear, well-reasoned and helpful guidance provided by the chief coroner.However, identifying which COVID 19 deaths are unnatural—and thus require coronial investigation and inquest—is not straightforward. It is likely to give rise to a number of challenges.

Deaths caused by exposure in work give rise to the greatest difficulty. Clinicians and care workers have already died of the disease. When deciding whether or not she has a duty to investigate, a coroner must do so if she has reason to suspect that the death was contributed to by some human error.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll