header-logo header-logo

Coronial process ‘alienating’

19 June 2024
Issue: 8076 / Categories: Legal News , Coronial law
printer mail-detail

A landmark report has found bereaved interviewees aren’t always informed about legal representation and many highlight a lack of sensitivity

Under the report’s recommendations, the coronial process would include forums for ‘restorative dialogue between the bereaved and professionals who had some involvement in the death’.

Compiled by researchers from Birkbeck and Bath universities between May 2021 and May 2024, the report, ‘Voicing loss’, examined the role of bereaved people in coroners’ investigations and inquests, and is the largest ever empirical study of lay and professional experiences of the coronial process in England and Wales.

While one bereaved interviewee described the process as ‘dignified’ and ‘transformational’, many others highlighted a lack of sensitivity in how professionals spoke about the deceased and dealt with evidence. The report states: ‘They also spoke of feeling alienated by proceedings which seemed to be oriented around legal professionals rather than their own rights, needs and expectations.

‘Some bereaved people (as well as other witnesses) described being subjected to aggressive or belittling questioning.’

The report recommends that bereaved people be given as much notice and information as possible about dates, attendance of witnesses and legal representatives and whether they will be required to give evidence. It advises that bereaved people be ‘fully informed of their right to receive evidence in advance of the final hearing, and how to obtain it’.

Respondents typically reported that they received limited information about their status and potential role in the process, and that communication with the local coroner service was poor.

One bereaved mother said: ‘We didn’t know we could have [legal representation]. We didn’t know, really, what our rights were, what we could have. Nobody told us.’

A bereaved sister said they would have gone into the inquest ‘blindly, with no legal support’, if it hadn’t been for the help of the organisation INQUEST.

Issue: 8076 / Categories: Legal News , Coronial law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Corporate and commercial teams in Cardiff boosted by dual partner hire

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

London hires to lead UK launch of international finance team

Switalskis—11 promotions

Switalskis—11 promotions

Firm marks start of year with firmwide promotions round

NEWS
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The next generation is inheriting more than assets—it is inheriting complexity. Writing in NLJ this week, experts from Penningtons Manches Cooper chart how global mobility, blended families and evolving values are reshaping private wealth advice
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming sport, from recruitment and training to officiating and fan engagement. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys at Law explains how AI now influences everything from injury prevention to tactical decisions, with clubs using tools such as ‘TacticAI’ to gain competitive edges
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll