header-logo header-logo

Coronial process ‘alienating’

19 June 2024
Issue: 8076 / Categories: Legal News , Coronial law
printer mail-detail

A landmark report has found bereaved interviewees aren’t always informed about legal representation and many highlight a lack of sensitivity

Under the report’s recommendations, the coronial process would include forums for ‘restorative dialogue between the bereaved and professionals who had some involvement in the death’.

Compiled by researchers from Birkbeck and Bath universities between May 2021 and May 2024, the report, ‘Voicing loss’, examined the role of bereaved people in coroners’ investigations and inquests, and is the largest ever empirical study of lay and professional experiences of the coronial process in England and Wales.

While one bereaved interviewee described the process as ‘dignified’ and ‘transformational’, many others highlighted a lack of sensitivity in how professionals spoke about the deceased and dealt with evidence. The report states: ‘They also spoke of feeling alienated by proceedings which seemed to be oriented around legal professionals rather than their own rights, needs and expectations.

‘Some bereaved people (as well as other witnesses) described being subjected to aggressive or belittling questioning.’

The report recommends that bereaved people be given as much notice and information as possible about dates, attendance of witnesses and legal representatives and whether they will be required to give evidence. It advises that bereaved people be ‘fully informed of their right to receive evidence in advance of the final hearing, and how to obtain it’.

Respondents typically reported that they received limited information about their status and potential role in the process, and that communication with the local coroner service was poor.

One bereaved mother said: ‘We didn’t know we could have [legal representation]. We didn’t know, really, what our rights were, what we could have. Nobody told us.’

A bereaved sister said they would have gone into the inquest ‘blindly, with no legal support’, if it hadn’t been for the help of the organisation INQUEST.

Issue: 8076 / Categories: Legal News , Coronial law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll