header-logo header-logo

19 June 2024
Issue: 8076 / Categories: Legal News , Coronial law
printer mail-detail

Coronial process ‘alienating’

A landmark report has found bereaved interviewees aren’t always informed about legal representation and many highlight a lack of sensitivity

Under the report’s recommendations, the coronial process would include forums for ‘restorative dialogue between the bereaved and professionals who had some involvement in the death’.

Compiled by researchers from Birkbeck and Bath universities between May 2021 and May 2024, the report, ‘Voicing loss’, examined the role of bereaved people in coroners’ investigations and inquests, and is the largest ever empirical study of lay and professional experiences of the coronial process in England and Wales.

While one bereaved interviewee described the process as ‘dignified’ and ‘transformational’, many others highlighted a lack of sensitivity in how professionals spoke about the deceased and dealt with evidence. The report states: ‘They also spoke of feeling alienated by proceedings which seemed to be oriented around legal professionals rather than their own rights, needs and expectations.

‘Some bereaved people (as well as other witnesses) described being subjected to aggressive or belittling questioning.’

The report recommends that bereaved people be given as much notice and information as possible about dates, attendance of witnesses and legal representatives and whether they will be required to give evidence. It advises that bereaved people be ‘fully informed of their right to receive evidence in advance of the final hearing, and how to obtain it’.

Respondents typically reported that they received limited information about their status and potential role in the process, and that communication with the local coroner service was poor.

One bereaved mother said: ‘We didn’t know we could have [legal representation]. We didn’t know, really, what our rights were, what we could have. Nobody told us.’

A bereaved sister said they would have gone into the inquest ‘blindly, with no legal support’, if it hadn’t been for the help of the organisation INQUEST.

Issue: 8076 / Categories: Legal News , Coronial law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll