header-logo header-logo

27 June 2012
Issue: 7520 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The cost of Jackson

ACL survey: “Jackson will increase costs disputes”

The number of costs disputes between solicitors and their clients will rise as a result of the Jackson reforms, costs lawyers have predicted.

As of next April, when the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) comes into force, success fees in “no-win, no-fee” cases will no longer be recoverable. Instead, clients will pay their own costs out of their damages and are therefore likely to take a keen interest in the amount of costs their solicitor racks up.

A survey of 137 members of the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL), published this week, showed 69% thought solicitor-client disputes would rise as a result.

Nearly a third of costs lawyers surveyed thought the Jackson reforms would discourage people from bringing cases, while more than half thought they would discourage solicitors from taking less straightforward cases.

Four out of 10 believe fierce competition will drive down the level of success fees, while nearly a third think costs will become more proportionate, and 42% think they will tilt the playing field in favour of defendants.

The survey uncovered common mistakes and misunderstandings by solicitors when dealing with costs. Failing to keep thorough records was the main complaint, followed by “they think they can do it themselves”. Other complaints included using unqualified costs draftsmen and only calling costs lawyers in when things have gone wrong.

Iain Stark, chairman of the ACL, says: “It is inevitable that solicitor/own client disputes will re-emerge post-LASPO, while the judiciary is emphasising how central costs management will be in the future.

“The truth is that many solicitors have neither the time nor experience to maximise the recovery of their own costs, and this is only going to become more difficult post-Jackson.”

Issue: 7520 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll