header-logo header-logo

09 April 2009 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7364 / Categories: Features , Tax , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The cost of settlement

Michael Tringham recounts how a £3m estate dispute racked up £400,000 in costs…

* * * * * *

So after three court hearings and estimated £400,000 legal costs, Thorner v Major and Others ([2009] All ER (D) 257 (Mar)) is finally settled. (Or is it? See below.) The case involves a Somerset farming family, some of whose members had not spoken to each other for many years.

David's father and Peter were first cousins. David, who never married, helped Peter at Steart Farm, Cheddar for almost 30 years, without remuneration. By 1997 will Peter left the residue of his estate to David, including his farm—but destroyed that will in order to remove one of the pecuniary legacies. After his death in November 2005 no will was found.

In accordance with the Intestacy Rules Peter's estate would then have devolved to his blood relatives. Except that David claimed to have the benefit of a proprietary estoppel against Peter and his estate, on the basis that over 15 years or more he acted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll