header-logo header-logo

Costly benefits

14 August 2008 / Rachael Healey , Simon Henthorn
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Are employers finding it too expensive to employ and insure older workers? Simon Henthorn & Rachael Healey

Age discrimination has received recent publicity with the Heyday challenge taking the stage in the European Court of Justice. However, the legislation creates other problems for employers. This article deals with the issue of provision of insurance benefits to older employees, particularly permanent health insurance (PHI) and private medical insurance.

The Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1031) (the Regulations) came into force on 1 October 2006, implementing the Framework Directive 2000/78/EC (the Directive). The Regulations provide that in employment and vocational training, it is unlawful to discriminate against workers on the grounds of age. Direct and indirect discrimination, victimisation, instructions to discriminate and harassment are all prohibited. The law covers workers of any age so both the young and old can claim protection.

Direct discrimination is less favourable treatment of a worker on the grounds of their age or apparent age—for instance a refusal to provide PHI cover only to workers over the age of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll