header-logo header-logo

14 August 2008 / Rachael Healey , Simon Henthorn
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Costly benefits

Are employers finding it too expensive to employ and insure older workers? Simon Henthorn & Rachael Healey

Age discrimination has received recent publicity with the Heyday challenge taking the stage in the European Court of Justice. However, the legislation creates other problems for employers. This article deals with the issue of provision of insurance benefits to older employees, particularly permanent health insurance (PHI) and private medical insurance.

The Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1031) (the Regulations) came into force on 1 October 2006, implementing the Framework Directive 2000/78/EC (the Directive). The Regulations provide that in employment and vocational training, it is unlawful to discriminate against workers on the grounds of age. Direct and indirect discrimination, victimisation, instructions to discriminate and harassment are all prohibited. The law covers workers of any age so both the young and old can claim protection.

Direct discrimination is less favourable treatment of a worker on the grounds of their age or apparent age—for instance a refusal to provide PHI cover only to workers over the age of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll