header-logo header-logo

Costs

29 March 2012
Issue: 7507 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets v Lovebox Festivals Ltd [2012] All ER (D) 128 (Mar)

The words “just and reasonable” in s 64 of the Magistrates’ Court Act 1981 did not apply solely to quantum. The discretion conferred by that section on a magistrates’ court to make an order as it thought just and reasonable applied equally to a decision as to which party, if any, should pay the costs of the appeal. What was just and reasonable would depend on all the relevant facts and circumstances of the case.

Costs might follow the event, but it might not be so. Where a complainant had successfully challenged an administrative decision of an authority and that authority had acted reasonably in the exercise of its public duty, a court should consider: (i) the financial prejudice to the particular claimant if an order for costs was not to be made in his favour; and (ii) the need for licensing authorities to make reasonable and apparently sound administrative decisions without suffering financial prejudice if those decisions

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Taylor Rose—nine promotions

Taylor Rose—nine promotions

Leadership strengthened across core practice areas with nine new partners

Fieldfisher—Rebecca Maxwell

Fieldfisher—Rebecca Maxwell

Real estate team welcomes partner inBirmingham

Ward Hadaway—14 trainee solicitors

Ward Hadaway—14 trainee solicitors

Firm strengthens commitment to nurturing future legal talent

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll