header-logo header-logo

13 July 2012
Issue: 7522 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs

Briscoe v Tilt [2012] All ER (D) 09 (Jul)

CPR Pt 45, s II, ought to apply to a broad category of cases. It was not just the easiest of cases that fell within the fixed recoverable costs regime. It was broadly all cases which settled pre-issue, including sometimes cases which required the approval of the court. Fixed costs applied there even though extra work was required of the solicitor. With regard to the test of exceptional, unusualness by itself was not enough. There had to be a circumstance which was exceptional enough to make it reasonably arguable that the claimant should not be held to the fixed recoverable costs regime. Most road traffic cases not exceeding £10,000 which settled pre-issue ought to be swept up.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll