header-logo header-logo

13 July 2012
Issue: 7522 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs

Briscoe v Tilt [2012] All ER (D) 09 (Jul)

CPR Pt 45, s II, ought to apply to a broad category of cases. It was not just the easiest of cases that fell within the fixed recoverable costs regime. It was broadly all cases which settled pre-issue, including sometimes cases which required the approval of the court. Fixed costs applied there even though extra work was required of the solicitor. With regard to the test of exceptional, unusualness by itself was not enough. There had to be a circumstance which was exceptional enough to make it reasonably arguable that the claimant should not be held to the fixed recoverable costs regime. Most road traffic cases not exceeding £10,000 which settled pre-issue ought to be swept up.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll