header-logo header-logo

17 June 2016
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs

Drummond v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2016] UKUT 221 (TCC), [2016] All ER (D) 21 (Jun)

The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (the UT) held that it had jurisdiction to make a protective costs order (PCO) and that the governing principles set out in R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] 4 All ER 1, would apply accordingly. However, in the present case, the UT set aside a previously imposed PCO on the basis that the order had been made without giving reasons and, more fundamentally, on a misunderstanding of the Revenue and Customs Commissioners’ position.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Senior associate joins family law team in London

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Firm appoints chief financial officer as it expands Essex office footprint

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

NEWS
Non-court dispute resolution is no longer an alternative in family law—it is rapidly becoming the norm
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
back-to-top-scroll