header-logo header-logo

11 January 2007 / Richard Harrison
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs a bomb

Issues of costs overshadow any litigation. Richard Harrison identifies some specific areas where the assessment system might be reformed

Those who deal with the costs assessment system on a day-to-day basis are probably well versed in its idiosyncrasies and have trained themselves to cope. However, looked at objectively, aspects of the system are ready for reform.

Definition of attendances

Consider the concept of ‘attendances’—a term which has a long history in the world of legal costs assessment and has given rise to the traditional ‘attendance note’. It is not defined in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), nor in Cook on Costs 2006—a Guide to Legal
Remuneration in the Civil Contentious and Non-contentious Business (LexisNexis Butterworths, November 2005).
Attendances can include things called ‘communications’. Communications are divided into ‘real communications’ and ‘routine communications’ (CPR Pt 43 PD 43(4.7). Communications means letters out and telephone calls. Routine communications are letters out, e-mails out and telephone calls “which because of their simplicity should not be regarded as letters

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll