header-logo header-logo

11 January 2007 / Richard Harrison
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs a bomb

Issues of costs overshadow any litigation. Richard Harrison identifies some specific areas where the assessment system might be reformed

Those who deal with the costs assessment system on a day-to-day basis are probably well versed in its idiosyncrasies and have trained themselves to cope. However, looked at objectively, aspects of the system are ready for reform.

Definition of attendances

Consider the concept of ‘attendances’—a term which has a long history in the world of legal costs assessment and has given rise to the traditional ‘attendance note’. It is not defined in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), nor in Cook on Costs 2006—a Guide to Legal
Remuneration in the Civil Contentious and Non-contentious Business (LexisNexis Butterworths, November 2005).
Attendances can include things called ‘communications’. Communications are divided into ‘real communications’ and ‘routine communications’ (CPR Pt 43 PD 43(4.7). Communications means letters out and telephone calls. Routine communications are letters out, e-mails out and telephone calls “which because of their simplicity should not be regarded as letters

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll