header-logo header-logo

13 September 2017 / Francis Kendall
Issue: 7761 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs budgeting: advantage Sir Cliff?

Master Marsh has made two important decisions on the approach to budgeting for the price of one, says Francis Kendall

  • Removal of the cap on the costs of budgeting & rejection of the request to comment on Sir Cliff’s incurred costs.

Just before the summer exodus, Chief Master Marsh further solidified the position of costs budgeting in litigation with two common-sense decisions in Sir Cliff Richard’s case against the BBC and South Yorkshire Police over coverage of a police raid on his home (Sir Cliff Richard OBE v The British Broadcasting Corporation and Another [2017] EWHC 1666 (Ch)).

First, Master Marsh applied the little (if ever) used provision to remove the cap on the costs of budgeting and second, he took an eminently sensible approach to the seeking of ‘comments’ on the significant incurred costs included within the, not insignificant, budget of the famous crooner.

Budgeting

In order to come to the first decision, Master Marsh needed to satisfy himself that that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll