header-logo header-logo

04 July 2025 / Kris Kilsby
Issue: 8123 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs control

224725
Kris Kilsby explains how to avoid third-party challenges under the Solicitors Act
  • The Court of Appeal’s decision in Kenig v Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP paved the way for third parties to challenge solicitors’ bills of costs.
  • The challenge for executors and probate solicitors will be how to protect the costs in those bills, or avoid beneficiaries making such applications in the first place.
  • Solicitors need to produce clear and accurate estimates, erring on the side of caution.

The decision in Kenig v Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP [2024] EWCA Civ 15, [2024] All ER (D) 72 (Jan) opened the door for third parties to have solicitors’ bills of costs assessed, and that such an assessment would have some teeth beyond what had been assumed before.

With the door firmly opened, it appears that many beneficiaries, particularly residuary beneficiaries, are now aware that their right to an assessment under the Solicitors Act 1974 is more likely to result in the bill being reduced upon assessment. For the beneficiaries, it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll