header-logo header-logo

Costs control

04 July 2025 / Kris Kilsby
Issue: 8123 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail
224725
Kris Kilsby explains how to avoid third-party challenges under the Solicitors Act
  • The Court of Appeal’s decision in Kenig v Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP paved the way for third parties to challenge solicitors’ bills of costs.
  • The challenge for executors and probate solicitors will be how to protect the costs in those bills, or avoid beneficiaries making such applications in the first place.
  • Solicitors need to produce clear and accurate estimates, erring on the side of caution.

The decision in Kenig v Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP [2024] EWCA Civ 15, [2024] All ER (D) 72 (Jan) opened the door for third parties to have solicitors’ bills of costs assessed, and that such an assessment would have some teeth beyond what had been assumed before.

With the door firmly opened, it appears that many beneficiaries, particularly residuary beneficiaries, are now aware that their right to an assessment under the Solicitors Act 1974 is more likely to result in the bill being reduced upon assessment. For the beneficiaries, it will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll