header-logo header-logo

04 July 2025 / Kris Kilsby
Issue: 8123 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs control

224725
Kris Kilsby explains how to avoid third-party challenges under the Solicitors Act
  • The Court of Appeal’s decision in Kenig v Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP paved the way for third parties to challenge solicitors’ bills of costs.
  • The challenge for executors and probate solicitors will be how to protect the costs in those bills, or avoid beneficiaries making such applications in the first place.
  • Solicitors need to produce clear and accurate estimates, erring on the side of caution.

The decision in Kenig v Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP [2024] EWCA Civ 15, [2024] All ER (D) 72 (Jan) opened the door for third parties to have solicitors’ bills of costs assessed, and that such an assessment would have some teeth beyond what had been assumed before.

With the door firmly opened, it appears that many beneficiaries, particularly residuary beneficiaries, are now aware that their right to an assessment under the Solicitors Act 1974 is more likely to result in the bill being reduced upon assessment. For the beneficiaries, it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll