header-logo header-logo

15 March 2021
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Costs Lawyer Standards Board—David Heath

Former government minister takes helm at Costs Lawyer Standards Board

Former government minister David Heath will this week take over as the new chair of the Costs Lawyer Standards Board (CLSB), the independent regulator of costs lawyers.

Until recently the senior independent director on the board of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), he takes over from Steve Winfield, who has been in post for seven years. He will lead a five-strong board, a majority of whom are lay members.

Mr Heath has served in a variety of roles in government, at both national and local level, and as a member of a number of regulatory boards. A qualified optician, he was for 18 years a Liberal Democrat MP, and served in government as Deputy Leader of the House of Commons and as Minister of State at DEFRA, before stepping down at the 2015 election.

In opposition, he worked principally in the fields of home affairs and criminal justice, shadowing the Lord Chancellor and serving on the justice select committee – he was also on the committee that scrutinised what became the Legal Services Act 2007.

Mr Heath said: “My experience made the CLSB an attractive opportunity. Its effectiveness has improved significantly over the last 18 months, as recognised by the Legal Services Board, and my role is to ensure that the public is properly protected while regulating Costs Lawyers in a fair and proportionate way.

“We will not be regulating for the sake of it – only where it has a positive impact on the public and/or the profession.

“The work of Costs Lawyers is vital to the operation of the justice system and law firms’ businesses. We will be pressing the case for the title of ‘Costs Lawyer’ to have statutory protection, and for the work of Costs Lawyers to be reserved legal activities – moves supported last year by Professor Stephen Mayson in his report on the regulation of the legal profession.”

Claire Green, chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers, the representative body for Costs Lawyers, said: “David has the perfect mix of experience and qualities for this post. There are big issues facing our profession as a small but important corner of the legal market, and David’s know-how should help steer us through them. The ACL looks forward to maintaining the constructive dialogue it has developed with the regulator.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

Nick Vernon of Walkers on swapping Birmingham for Bermuda and building an employment practice by the sea

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Global firm re-elects CEO for second term

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Business appoints managing director of operational excellence

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll