header-logo header-logo

15 November 2012
Issue: 7538 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Costs may cause chaos

Call for lawyers to get a handle on litigation funding

Lawyers risk losing thousands of pounds in fees and legal costs unless they get a handle on litigation funding, costs lawyers and barristers have warned.

A panel of experts recently reviewed the costs-management pilots in the mercantile courts and technology and construction courts at The Future of Costs Seminar, co-hosted by 3PB Barristers and Cost Advocates (CA). The pilots require lawyers from both sides to provide a detailed estimate of incurred and future costs in the litigation via a nine-page Precedent HB form.

The panel estimated that lawyers in the pilots are spending an average of 2.5 hours filling out a Precedent HB form, and warned that getting budgets wrong could be disastrous.

They highlighted the case of Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2012] EWHC 90218 (Costs), where the budget for disclosure and witness statements was approved at £23,737. The final amount claimed in the bill of costs was £316,447, resulting in a loss in costs of £292,710.

Jon Lord, principal costs lawyer at CA, said: “The Precedent HB form looks straightforward enough but the thought process behind it is a lot more complicated. Lawyers are required to provide the breakdown for pre-action costs, disclosure, witness statements, expert reports, fee earners’ time, counsel’s fees, contingents and other disbursements. Trying to calculate these is a very complex procedure.”

Emilie Woolley, senior costs solicitor at CA, said: “Law firms need to be prepared for the shift from exchanging broad estimates of costs already incurred to prospective budgeting. Lawyers need to be prepared for the strategic and tactical deviousness that may become apparent, and be ready to scrutinise their opponent’s budgets without divulging their own secrets.”

However, costs budgets could lead to greater certainty and transparency if lawyers prepare ahead of the reform, she said.

Graeme Sampson, barrister at 3PB, warned firms that failure to follow costs-management procedure could result in adverse costs orders.

Issue: 7538 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Employment boutique strengthens data protection and privacy offering with senior consultant hire

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll