header-logo header-logo

31 March 2011
Issue: 7459 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Costs—Order for costs—Indemnity costs

Southwark London Borough Council v IBM UK Ltd [2011] EWHC 653 (TCC), [2011] All ER (D) 261 (Mar)

Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court, Akenhead J, 21 Mar 2011

The TCC has reiterated the principles on which the court will make an order for indemnity costs.

Nicholas Stewart QC (instructed by the Legal services Department of Southwark Borough Council) for the authority. Jeremy Nicholson QC and Terence Bergin (instructed by Blake Lapthorn) for the defendant.

The claimant local authority brought proceedings against the defendant company for damages in respect of, inter alia, breach of a contract in relation to software contractually supplied to the authority by the defendant company, which was to be provided in connection with the implementation of a master data management system. On 10 January 2011, the defendant’s solicitors made an offer to settle the action on the basis that each side pay its own costs. That offer was to remain open until 4pm on 14 January 2011. The authority rejected the offer, however, and the matter proceeded to trial.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
Jonathan Fisher KC’s wide-ranging fraud report contains worthwhile proposals, but turning them into workable reform will require money, capacity and political will
A Court of Appeal ruling shows that a failed nuisance claim may still leave a neighbour liable in negligence where foreseeable harm could readily have been avoided
The government has stepped back from a proposed early-release exclusion limited to unlawful act manslaughter, opting instead to exclude all manslaughter sentences
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience
back-to-top-scroll