The Jackson reforms roll on with further endorsement from the government by publication of its response to the consultation on proposed changes to the civil costs regime.
Thomas Jefferson declared it in 1776: all men are equal. The French followed suit a little later and after the loss of a number of heads...
There is a question, which has taxed lawyers and politicians alike for many years now. Is war ever legal? Presidents and prime ministers have sought resolutions, or indeed, not sought resolutions from the United Nations (UN), as justification for war...
David Tyme provides a timely update on TUPE & pre-packed administrations
In the first of a series of NLJ articles on the new FPR, David Burrows focuses on how to issue proceedings & transitional provisions
Does Edwards-Tubb mark the end of “expert shopping”, ask Johnathan Payne & Catherine Urquhart
Edward Peters & Tamsin Cox discuss inadvertent acceptance, disputed boundaries & consultation requirements
Tony Guise welcomes the advent of COLPs & COFAs
Peter Vaines serves up an exclusive on residency, asset transfers & VAT on roller blinds
Claire Sanders warns solicitors to comply with their client retainer or face the consequences
MOVERS & SHAKERS
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson
Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating
Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor
West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire
JMW—Belinda Brooke
Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire
The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ
