header-logo header-logo

A cautionary tale

31 March 2011 / Claire Sanders
Issue: 7459 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Claire Sanders warns solicitors to comply with their client retainer or face the consequences

A refusal to continue working for a client until he paid outstanding fees amounted to a repudiatory breach of contract by solicitors the consequence of which was that they were not entitled to recover any of their fees. The stark warning from the High Court in the case of Minkin v Cawdery Fireman & Taylor [2011] EWHC 177, [2011] All ER (D) 82 (Feb) is that solicitors must comply with the provisions in their client retainer letters and that retainer letters must be in clear terms.

Facts

In Minkin the claimant, instructed the appellant solicitors (the firm) to represent him in matrimonial proceedings, in particular at the return hearing of an application by his wife for an occupation order and non-molestation order. The day before the hearing it transpired that the claimant’s wife had left the matrimonial home and rented it to tenants.

The firm advised the client about this and corresponded with the tenants agents. The occupation order was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll