header-logo header-logo

31 March 2011 / Tony Guise
Issue: 7459 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

A better way

Tony Guise welcomes the advent of COLPs & COFAs

The changes which alternative business structures (ABSs) will bring about in the market for the delivery of legal services and to those firms who may not even be considering entering into an ABS remain the stuff of conjecture and nightmare-scenarios abound. However, there is a more tangible change taking place on 6 October 2011 to the way all legal service providers will be required to operate in the future.

The new Solicitors Regualtion Authority (SRA) handbook, which comes into force on 6 October requires both ABSs and solicitors firms to appoint a compliance officer for legal practice (COLP) and a compliance officer for finance and administration (COFA) in order to become authorised. What will the implications of these new roles be and what effect are they likely to have upon the regulated community? Both are creations of the Legal Services Act 2007, where they  have the name head of legal practice and head of legal compliance—the SRA has changed the titles and extended the requirement to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll