header-logo header-logo

31 March 2011 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7459 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines serves up an exclusive on residency, asset transfers & VAT on roller blinds

The latest decision in the saga of Grace v HMRC was published on 1 February and regrettably the clarification for which we yearn on the subject of residence is as far away as ever.

Grace was a South African pilot who came to the UK in 1986 and was employed by British Caledonian. He had a house near Gatwick. In 1997 his marriage was dissolved and he went back to South Africa. He retained his UK house which he used in order to rest, before or after carrying out his duties as a long haul pilot. In the following three years he visited the UK for 41, 71 and 70 days. Grace thought he was not resident.  However, HMRC considered that he had remained a UK resident. Grace appealed to the Special Commissioners, representing himself, and demonstrated to the tribunal that he had made a distinct break from the UK and had become non resident in 1997. A rare

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll