header-logo header-logo

Pre-packed TUPE

31 March 2011 / David Tyme
Issue: 7459 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

David Tyme provides a timely update on TUPE & pre-packed administrations

In OTG Limited and others v Barke and Others (EAT) [2011] UKEAT 0320/09/1602, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered five appeals listed together and determined that the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE) applied to pre-packed administrations. A pre-pack administration is where an insolvency practitioner becomes the administrator of a company experiencing financial difficulties and makes arrangements in advance of his appointment for the company to be sold immediately after his appointment. This circumvents the need to arrange a creditors meeting and also avoids any input from the court.

The relevant facts of each of the cases under appeal were as follows:

(i) The employer went into administration and on the same day, the entire business was sold as a going concern without any debts.  

(ii) The employer went into administration and the business was sold immediately as a going concern. Two days later the claimant was dismissed.  

(iii) The claimant was dismissed on grounds of redundancy with immediate effect and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll