header-logo header-logo

31 March 2011 / David Tyme
Issue: 7459 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Pre-packed TUPE

David Tyme provides a timely update on TUPE & pre-packed administrations

In OTG Limited and others v Barke and Others (EAT) [2011] UKEAT 0320/09/1602, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered five appeals listed together and determined that the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE) applied to pre-packed administrations. A pre-pack administration is where an insolvency practitioner becomes the administrator of a company experiencing financial difficulties and makes arrangements in advance of his appointment for the company to be sold immediately after his appointment. This circumvents the need to arrange a creditors meeting and also avoids any input from the court.

The relevant facts of each of the cases under appeal were as follows:

(i) The employer went into administration and on the same day, the entire business was sold as a going concern without any debts.  

(ii) The employer went into administration and the business was sold immediately as a going concern. Two days later the claimant was dismissed.  

(iii) The claimant was dismissed on grounds of redundancy with immediate effect and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll