header-logo header-logo

31 March 2011 / David Burrows
Issue: 7459 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Under new rule

In the first of a series of NLJ articles on the new FPR, David Burrows focuses on how to issue proceedings & transitional provisions

In many respects the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010) are derived from the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (CPR 1998). Under CPR 1998 most claims are issued under Pt 7. A few claims, eg where evidence is not likely to be greatly in issue (including in judicial review applications), are issued under the Pt 8 procedure; and in either of those forms of proceedings interim applications for an interim remedy can be issued under Pt 23.

A similar arrangement applies in family proceedings, save that the generic claim under Pt 7 is not possible. Family proceedings derive from a variety of different statutory sources each with different remedies: matrimonial and financial remedy proceedings under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (and parallel proceedings under the Civil Partnership Act 2004); proceedings under the Children Act 1989; domestic abuse and forced marriage protection under the Family Law Act 1996. These are the main applicable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll