header-logo header-logo

Under new rule

31 March 2011 / David Burrows
Issue: 7459 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

In the first of a series of NLJ articles on the new FPR, David Burrows focuses on how to issue proceedings & transitional provisions

In many respects the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010) are derived from the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (CPR 1998). Under CPR 1998 most claims are issued under Pt 7. A few claims, eg where evidence is not likely to be greatly in issue (including in judicial review applications), are issued under the Pt 8 procedure; and in either of those forms of proceedings interim applications for an interim remedy can be issued under Pt 23.

A similar arrangement applies in family proceedings, save that the generic claim under Pt 7 is not possible. Family proceedings derive from a variety of different statutory sources each with different remedies: matrimonial and financial remedy proceedings under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (and parallel proceedings under the Civil Partnership Act 2004); proceedings under the Children Act 1989; domestic abuse and forced marriage protection under the Family Law Act 1996. These are the main applicable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll