header-logo header-logo

Costs without proceedings

07 October 2010
Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

If a claimant makes a CPR Pt 36 offer before the issue of proceedings and...

If a claimant makes a CPR Pt 36 offer before the issue of proceedings and that offer is accepted, is the claimant entitled to his costs? It is clear that he would be if proceedings had been issued, but Pt 36 makes no comment on the costs effect of a pre-issue offer being accepted. Alternatively, if a claimant were to make a pre-issue Pt 36 offer and included a provision that acceptance was conditional on payment of the claimant’s costs would that be a valid offer for the purposes of Pt 36 or not? As a substantial amount of work is often needed to prepare a claimant Pt 36 offer it would seem fair, and in the spirit of avoiding unnecessary proceedings, if costs could be recovered pre-issue. If they cannot, one would be better off issuing and then making a Pt 36 offer immediately thereafter?

As a matter of vires, the CPR only apply to proceedings which have by definition

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll