header-logo header-logo

07 October 2010
Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs without proceedings

If a claimant makes a CPR Pt 36 offer before the issue of proceedings and...

If a claimant makes a CPR Pt 36 offer before the issue of proceedings and that offer is accepted, is the claimant entitled to his costs? It is clear that he would be if proceedings had been issued, but Pt 36 makes no comment on the costs effect of a pre-issue offer being accepted. Alternatively, if a claimant were to make a pre-issue Pt 36 offer and included a provision that acceptance was conditional on payment of the claimant’s costs would that be a valid offer for the purposes of Pt 36 or not? As a substantial amount of work is often needed to prepare a claimant Pt 36 offer it would seem fair, and in the spirit of avoiding unnecessary proceedings, if costs could be recovered pre-issue. If they cannot, one would be better off issuing and then making a Pt 36 offer immediately thereafter?

As a matter of vires, the CPR only apply to proceedings which have by definition

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll