header-logo header-logo

Council liable for unlawful eviction

04 December 2014
Issue: 7634 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Statutory damages for unlawful eviction are calculated in the same way regardless of whether a public sector or private landlord is involved, the Supreme Court has unanimously held.

The decision, in Loveridge v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Lambeth [2014] UKSC 65, means substantial statutory damages can be awarded against local authorities for unlawful eviction. 

Harry Loveridge was evicted in his absence while on a five-month visit to Ghana, even though he was still paying his rent by standing order. Lambeth Council, fearing he had died, forced entry to the flat, disposed of his possessions and installed a new tenant. He was awarded £90,500 damages plus £9,000 for trespass to his goods.

Michael Paget of Cornerstone Barristers, who acted for Mr Loveridge, the tenant, says: “The Supreme Court has made it clear that the Housing Act 1988 applies to all landlords equally, with a potential heavy penalty when a tenant with significant security of tenure is unlawfully evicted. Trying to regain possession without using the courts may not be worth it.

“This statutory damages dog has an awful bite but there is absolutely no reason at all to get bitten. Where the evicted tenant had significant security then full statutory damages will be significant, but no landlord should end up being subject to a full award. 

“Where a mistake is made by the landlord it should be corrected as quickly as possible. Lawfully enforcing a possession order through the courts is by far the safest way to guarantee vacant possession.”

Statutory damages are calculated by considering the value of the building with the tenant benefiting from security of tenure and without such security of tenure. It is a purely hypothetical process and does not require an actual sale to a willing buyer.

The Supreme Court held that the Court of Appeal had been wrong to consider what would actually happen after a sale to a willing buyer. The fact that a secure tenancy would be downgraded to an assured tenancy after sale to a private sector buyer was irrelevant. 

 

Issue: 7634 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll