header-logo header-logo

Counting the costs

27 November 2014 / Jon Lord
Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Jon Lord considers seven wonders of a modern costs lawyer’s world

When I first started working in costs, a typical “costs draftsman” led a relatively solitary existence. We were only ever involved at the end of the case to draft a bill which was usually legal aid. Detailed assessments were few and far between so the office was a quiet place to be with the hum of the traffic outside only interrupted by some analogue dictation.

Jump forward a few years to the present day and office life has changed considerably. Aside from the leaps in technology from analogue dictation to all-singing, all-dancing cloud-based systems, the modern costs lawyer’s office is a hive of activity. The increase in inter-parties work which resulted from the Woolf Reforms has meant far more trips to court on detailed assessments and interlocutory applications within costs proceedings.

Costs lawyers are still viewed by some as still being part of the back-end litigation support function but, post-Jackson, we

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll