header-logo header-logo

Counting the costs

27 November 2014 / Jon Lord
Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Jon Lord considers seven wonders of a modern costs lawyer’s world

When I first started working in costs, a typical “costs draftsman” led a relatively solitary existence. We were only ever involved at the end of the case to draft a bill which was usually legal aid. Detailed assessments were few and far between so the office was a quiet place to be with the hum of the traffic outside only interrupted by some analogue dictation.

Jump forward a few years to the present day and office life has changed considerably. Aside from the leaps in technology from analogue dictation to all-singing, all-dancing cloud-based systems, the modern costs lawyer’s office is a hive of activity. The increase in inter-parties work which resulted from the Woolf Reforms has meant far more trips to court on detailed assessments and interlocutory applications within costs proceedings.

Costs lawyers are still viewed by some as still being part of the back-end litigation support function but, post-Jackson, we

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
back-to-top-scroll