header-logo header-logo

13 January 2011
Issue: 7448 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Countryfile presenter suffered age discrimination

TV presenter Miriam O’Reilly has won her age discrimination claim against the BBC.

In O’Reilly v BBC, this week, London central employment tribunal found that O’Reilly, an award-winning presenter of Countryfile, suffered age discrimination when the BBC replaced her with a younger presenter when the programme moved to primetime. 

A combined claim of sex discrimination was not upheld. However the tribunal acknowledged that older women “faced particular disadvantage within the broadcast media”.

The tribunal further found that O’Reilly, aged 51 at the time, was victimised because her boss thought wrongly that she went to the press, and this led her to be dropped from Countryfile Magazine.

The tribunal found that “it would not be proportionate to do away with older presenters simply to pander to the assumed prejudice of some younger viewers”.

Camilla Palmer, partner at Leigh Day & Co, who represented O’Reilly, said: “This has huge implications for all broadcasters not just the BBC.

“The lesson is that presenters should be selected for their ability, not their age. Women and men on screen should not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll