header-logo header-logo

Countryfile presenter suffered age discrimination

13 January 2011
Issue: 7448 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

TV presenter Miriam O’Reilly has won her age discrimination claim against the BBC.

In O’Reilly v BBC, this week, London central employment tribunal found that O’Reilly, an award-winning presenter of Countryfile, suffered age discrimination when the BBC replaced her with a younger presenter when the programme moved to primetime. 

A combined claim of sex discrimination was not upheld. However the tribunal acknowledged that older women “faced particular disadvantage within the broadcast media”.

The tribunal further found that O’Reilly, aged 51 at the time, was victimised because her boss thought wrongly that she went to the press, and this led her to be dropped from Countryfile Magazine.

The tribunal found that “it would not be proportionate to do away with older presenters simply to pander to the assumed prejudice of some younger viewers”.

Camilla Palmer, partner at Leigh Day & Co, who represented O’Reilly, said: “This has huge implications for all broadcasters not just the BBC.

“The lesson is that presenters should be selected for their ability, not their age. Women and men on screen should not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll