header-logo header-logo

Court out

26 May 2017 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7747 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
nlj_7747_athelstane

In the run up to the General Election, Athelstane Aamodt explains how the Election Court operates

As lawyers know, there are all sorts of courts and tribunals in the UK whose function depends on the matter to be decided. For the most part they derive their existence and the limits of their powers from statutes and statutory instruments. They are familiar to us: the Employment Tribunal, the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), the First-Tier Tax Tribunal, and so forth. They all have their quirks and idiosyncrasies. Of all the courts in the UK, however, none is quite as unusual as the Election Court.

The law expressly allows people to question the outcome of parliamentary elections as well as European Parliament elections, local elections, Welsh assembly elections and local referendums by presenting a petition, which is essentially a claim form, that sets out the reasons for questioning the election and the relief that is sought by the petitioner.

Petition requirements

To be able to petition—by way of example—a parliamentary election, the petitioner needs to be one of the following:

  • a
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll