header-logo header-logo

15 February 2013 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7548 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Courting controversy

Roger Smith considers courts & constitutions

Someone in the UK Supreme Court has a talent for communication. To the court’s existing Twitter feed and live streaming of hearings, we now have the promise of a regular presence on YouTube. The court has committed itself to five minute summaries of its court judgments. These are written and delivered by one of the justices and have been given, but not regularly broadcast, since the court was established in 2009. The summaries are designed to pick out the key facts and findings without the legal analysis present either in the judgment itself or the written press summaries.

The YouTube performances are hardly dramatic but they are rather good in providing accessible versions of the judgments. They underline how the court has gone beyond its predecessor, the appellate committee of the House of Lords. In a recent speech, Lord Carnwath reflected: “I believe there has been a profound change…over time [the Supreme Court] has brought a new sense of collective identity.” He quoted earlier words of Lord Hope: “The most

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll