header-logo header-logo

15 February 2013 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7548 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Courting controversy

Roger Smith considers courts & constitutions

Someone in the UK Supreme Court has a talent for communication. To the court’s existing Twitter feed and live streaming of hearings, we now have the promise of a regular presence on YouTube. The court has committed itself to five minute summaries of its court judgments. These are written and delivered by one of the justices and have been given, but not regularly broadcast, since the court was established in 2009. The summaries are designed to pick out the key facts and findings without the legal analysis present either in the judgment itself or the written press summaries.

The YouTube performances are hardly dramatic but they are rather good in providing accessible versions of the judgments. They underline how the court has gone beyond its predecessor, the appellate committee of the House of Lords. In a recent speech, Lord Carnwath reflected: “I believe there has been a profound change…over time [the Supreme Court] has brought a new sense of collective identity.” He quoted earlier words of Lord Hope: “The most

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll