header-logo header-logo

06 January 2014
Issue: 7589 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Courts empty for legal aid action

Criminal lawyers desert courts in protest over legal aid cuts

Criminal barristers and solicitors massed outside criminal courts across England and Wales today in a half-day of action against legal aid cuts—the Bar’s first walkout in its history.

Lawyers deserted Crown and Magistrates’ courts in droves, with many trials listed for the morning re-scheduled ahead of the protest.

The campaigners, many sporting full court attire of wigs and gowns, are calling for a re-think of Ministry of Justice (MoJ) plans to cut £220m a year from the criminal legal aid budget. They argue that the cuts will be unsustainable, and will increase the risk of miscarriages of justice.

Barristers and solicitors face a cut of about 17.5%—30% in their fees if the plans go ahead, while solicitors will be paid the same amount if their client pleads guilty or not, raising a conflict of interest.

Earnings at the criminal Bar vary widely, with many making less than £25,000.

James Welch, Liberty’s legal director, says the proposals “put the fairness of our criminal justice system in serious jeopardy”. 

In contrast with the robust action on display this week, the Law Society has controversially pursued a policy of engagement with the MoJ over legal aid, leading to it losing a vote of no confidence in its leadership 228 votes to 213 shortly before Christmas.

James Parry, partner at Liverpool firm Parry Welch Lacey, who led the campaign for the vote, says proposed fee cuts will make the majority of criminal defence work unviable, and two-thirds of criminal law firms could go out of business. Fees are to be cut by 17.5%, although Parry says the cuts will be worse in reality as there will be a flat fee of £321 for magistrates’ court trials.

However, Des Hudson, chief executive of the Law Society, defended its tactics, saying non-engagement “did not work”.

Issue: 7589 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll