header-logo header-logo

18 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: 'Remote' justice update

Remote hearings should be held where possible in response to Covid-19, the Lord Chief Justice has urged, and ‘no new trial should start in the Crown Court unless it is expected to last for three days or less’ if listed to start before the end of April

Lord Burnett said: ‘These cases will be kept under review and the position regarding short trials will be revisited as circumstances develop.’ Trials currently underway ‘will generally proceed.’

In an earlier update, Lord Burnett warned that ‘it is not realistic to suppose that it will be business as usual in any jurisdiction, but it is of vital importance that the administration of justice does not grind to a halt’.

The line from HM Courts and Tribunals (HMCTS) until now has been that hearings will continue as normal unless parties are advised otherwise.

Lord Burnett said: ‘Given the rapidly evolving situation, there is an urgent need to increase the use of telephone and video technology immediately to hold remote hearings where possible.

‘Emergency legislation is being drafted which is likely to contain clauses that expand the powers in criminal courts to use technology in a wider range of hearings. The Civil Procedure Rules and Family Procedure Rules provide for considerable flexibility.’

Earlier this week, the Bar Council called for a halt to jury trials.

‘Barristers up and down the country are telling us that jurors are having to drop out of cases because they are self-isolating or, worse, coming to court when they should not, and thereby putting everyone’s health at risk,’ Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said.

Louise Hodges, head of criminal litigation at Kingsley Napley, said there was ‘a lot of concern’ among those working in the criminal justice system.

‘The various agencies are not able to provide the assurances that they have conducted proper risk assessments or that buildings and facilities, including court rooms, custody suites, cells or secure transport, are deep cleaned to sufficient standards to ensure the safety of individuals. It is probably to be expected now that non-essential trials will be delayed.’ 

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll