header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: 'Remote' justice update

18 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
Remote hearings should be held where possible in response to Covid-19, the Lord Chief Justice has urged, and ‘no new trial should start in the Crown Court unless it is expected to last for three days or less’ if listed to start before the end of April

Lord Burnett said: ‘These cases will be kept under review and the position regarding short trials will be revisited as circumstances develop.’ Trials currently underway ‘will generally proceed.’

In an earlier update, Lord Burnett warned that ‘it is not realistic to suppose that it will be business as usual in any jurisdiction, but it is of vital importance that the administration of justice does not grind to a halt’.

The line from HM Courts and Tribunals (HMCTS) until now has been that hearings will continue as normal unless parties are advised otherwise.

Lord Burnett said: ‘Given the rapidly evolving situation, there is an urgent need to increase the use of telephone and video technology immediately to hold remote hearings where possible.

‘Emergency legislation is being drafted which is likely to contain clauses that expand the powers in criminal courts to use technology in a wider range of hearings. The Civil Procedure Rules and Family Procedure Rules provide for considerable flexibility.’

Earlier this week, the Bar Council called for a halt to jury trials.

‘Barristers up and down the country are telling us that jurors are having to drop out of cases because they are self-isolating or, worse, coming to court when they should not, and thereby putting everyone’s health at risk,’ Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said.

Louise Hodges, head of criminal litigation at Kingsley Napley, said there was ‘a lot of concern’ among those working in the criminal justice system.

‘The various agencies are not able to provide the assurances that they have conducted proper risk assessments or that buildings and facilities, including court rooms, custody suites, cells or secure transport, are deep cleaned to sufficient standards to ensure the safety of individuals. It is probably to be expected now that non-essential trials will be delayed.’ 

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

Firm elects new senior partner to lead next phase of growth

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Partner appointed head of family and divorce

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Financial and professional risks team expand with dual partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll