header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: 'Remote' justice update

18 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
Remote hearings should be held where possible in response to Covid-19, the Lord Chief Justice has urged, and ‘no new trial should start in the Crown Court unless it is expected to last for three days or less’ if listed to start before the end of April

Lord Burnett said: ‘These cases will be kept under review and the position regarding short trials will be revisited as circumstances develop.’ Trials currently underway ‘will generally proceed.’

In an earlier update, Lord Burnett warned that ‘it is not realistic to suppose that it will be business as usual in any jurisdiction, but it is of vital importance that the administration of justice does not grind to a halt’.

The line from HM Courts and Tribunals (HMCTS) until now has been that hearings will continue as normal unless parties are advised otherwise.

Lord Burnett said: ‘Given the rapidly evolving situation, there is an urgent need to increase the use of telephone and video technology immediately to hold remote hearings where possible.

‘Emergency legislation is being drafted which is likely to contain clauses that expand the powers in criminal courts to use technology in a wider range of hearings. The Civil Procedure Rules and Family Procedure Rules provide for considerable flexibility.’

Earlier this week, the Bar Council called for a halt to jury trials.

‘Barristers up and down the country are telling us that jurors are having to drop out of cases because they are self-isolating or, worse, coming to court when they should not, and thereby putting everyone’s health at risk,’ Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said.

Louise Hodges, head of criminal litigation at Kingsley Napley, said there was ‘a lot of concern’ among those working in the criminal justice system.

‘The various agencies are not able to provide the assurances that they have conducted proper risk assessments or that buildings and facilities, including court rooms, custody suites, cells or secure transport, are deep cleaned to sufficient standards to ensure the safety of individuals. It is probably to be expected now that non-essential trials will be delayed.’ 

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll