header-logo header-logo

27 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: 157 priority courts to stay open

A network of priority courts is to be kept open, consolidating the work of courts and tribunals into fewer buildings during the COVID-19 pandemic

Some 157 priority courts and tribunal buildings will be kept open for essential face-to-face hearings, representing 42% of the 370 Crown, magistrates, county and family courts and tribunals in England and Wales, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) announced this week.

A further 124 court and tribunal buildings will be closed to the public but open to HM Courts and Tribunal (HMCTS) staff, the judiciary and those from other agencies.

The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett said: ‘Technology is being used creatively to ensure that many cases can continue.

‘Not everything can be dealt with remotely and so we need to maintain functioning courts. These temporary adjustments to how we use the court estate will help ensure that we can continue to deal with work appropriately in all jurisdictions whilst safeguarding the well-being of all those who work in and visit the courts.’

The media and members of the public can attend priority court hearings in person, if safe to do so in line with Public Health England guidance.

The measures take effect from 30 March.

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar, said: ‘In the face of this extraordinary pandemic, it makes sense to consolidate our constrained resources to keep the justice system on track.

‘It is in the public interest that justice keeps going and in the circumstances we welcome the use of remote hearings. With much court and tribunal business now being conducted remotely, we hope that keeping fewer court buildings open will ensure essential work can continue without risking the health of those attending court.

‘At the end of this crisis, justice must remain strong and intact and our legal professions must survive to continue to represent the public.’

The Law Society also welcomed the decision. President Simon Davis said: ‘Balancing safety with the need to keep the wheels of justice turning is incredibly difficult.

‘In these difficult circumstances, holding hearings that require physical attendance in a reduced number of courts, and ensuring full safety measures in those courts, is a logical approach. Local, accessible justice is however is vital to our society. It will also be key for the courts to be re-opened fully once the crisis is over, to avoid any long term restrictions on the public's access to justice.’

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll