header-logo header-logo

27 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: 157 priority courts to stay open

A network of priority courts is to be kept open, consolidating the work of courts and tribunals into fewer buildings during the COVID-19 pandemic

Some 157 priority courts and tribunal buildings will be kept open for essential face-to-face hearings, representing 42% of the 370 Crown, magistrates, county and family courts and tribunals in England and Wales, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) announced this week.

A further 124 court and tribunal buildings will be closed to the public but open to HM Courts and Tribunal (HMCTS) staff, the judiciary and those from other agencies.

The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett said: ‘Technology is being used creatively to ensure that many cases can continue.

‘Not everything can be dealt with remotely and so we need to maintain functioning courts. These temporary adjustments to how we use the court estate will help ensure that we can continue to deal with work appropriately in all jurisdictions whilst safeguarding the well-being of all those who work in and visit the courts.’

The media and members of the public can attend priority court hearings in person, if safe to do so in line with Public Health England guidance.

The measures take effect from 30 March.

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar, said: ‘In the face of this extraordinary pandemic, it makes sense to consolidate our constrained resources to keep the justice system on track.

‘It is in the public interest that justice keeps going and in the circumstances we welcome the use of remote hearings. With much court and tribunal business now being conducted remotely, we hope that keeping fewer court buildings open will ensure essential work can continue without risking the health of those attending court.

‘At the end of this crisis, justice must remain strong and intact and our legal professions must survive to continue to represent the public.’

The Law Society also welcomed the decision. President Simon Davis said: ‘Balancing safety with the need to keep the wheels of justice turning is incredibly difficult.

‘In these difficult circumstances, holding hearings that require physical attendance in a reduced number of courts, and ensuring full safety measures in those courts, is a logical approach. Local, accessible justice is however is vital to our society. It will also be key for the courts to be re-opened fully once the crisis is over, to avoid any long term restrictions on the public's access to justice.’

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll