header-logo header-logo

30 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Company directors given breathing space

Insolvency lawyers have welcomed the government’s decision to suspend the wrongful trading law during the COVID-19 pandemic, but raised questions about preferential paying

Currently, directors of limited liability companies can become personally liable for business debts, under the Insolvency Act 1986, if they continue to trade while unable to pay their debts (wrongful trading). There does not need to be any fraudulent intent, only poor judgment or wishful thinking.

Last week, however, the government announced a package of measures for businesses, including suspending wrongful trading provisions for three months, backdated to 1 March, to protect company directors from the threat of personal liability.

Other measures include enabling companies either to hold AGMs online or postpone the meetings, and granting a three-month extension to the filing of company accounts. Business Secretary Alok Sharma said the measures would give bosses ‘much-needed breathing space to keep their workers employed and their companies going’.

Jennifer Marshall, president of the Insolvency Lawyers Association, said: ‘Suspending wrongful trading, in particular, will assist directors in accessing government or bank funding without concerns regarding personal liability.’

Frances Coulson, senior partner and head of insolvency at Moon Beever, said: ‘Everyone is banging on about wrongful trading but no one has really mentioned sanctioning the ability to preferentially pay suppliers.

‘Bad directors often make preferential payments to keep certain suppliers sweet so they transfer over to a newco, dumping other creditors, particularly involuntary creditors such as utilities and local councils as well as HMRC (until this December when HMRC will become a preferential creditor again).’

Coulson said the ‘well-intentioned’ suspension ‘won’t rescue long term abusers of credit, but will help cover the instant crisis.

‘The changes also look as if they will allow preferential payments to suppliers, in order to enable continuation of trading. This needs to be carefully framed, as such preferences are often made solely to shift the business away from creditors rather than to keep the existing company going. Directors need a moratorium now for good reason but must not forget their statutory duties. Consultation with insolvency professionals now might save pain later.’

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll