header-logo header-logo

30 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Company directors given breathing space

Insolvency lawyers have welcomed the government’s decision to suspend the wrongful trading law during the COVID-19 pandemic, but raised questions about preferential paying

Currently, directors of limited liability companies can become personally liable for business debts, under the Insolvency Act 1986, if they continue to trade while unable to pay their debts (wrongful trading). There does not need to be any fraudulent intent, only poor judgment or wishful thinking.

Last week, however, the government announced a package of measures for businesses, including suspending wrongful trading provisions for three months, backdated to 1 March, to protect company directors from the threat of personal liability.

Other measures include enabling companies either to hold AGMs online or postpone the meetings, and granting a three-month extension to the filing of company accounts. Business Secretary Alok Sharma said the measures would give bosses ‘much-needed breathing space to keep their workers employed and their companies going’.

Jennifer Marshall, president of the Insolvency Lawyers Association, said: ‘Suspending wrongful trading, in particular, will assist directors in accessing government or bank funding without concerns regarding personal liability.’

Frances Coulson, senior partner and head of insolvency at Moon Beever, said: ‘Everyone is banging on about wrongful trading but no one has really mentioned sanctioning the ability to preferentially pay suppliers.

‘Bad directors often make preferential payments to keep certain suppliers sweet so they transfer over to a newco, dumping other creditors, particularly involuntary creditors such as utilities and local councils as well as HMRC (until this December when HMRC will become a preferential creditor again).’

Coulson said the ‘well-intentioned’ suspension ‘won’t rescue long term abusers of credit, but will help cover the instant crisis.

‘The changes also look as if they will allow preferential payments to suppliers, in order to enable continuation of trading. This needs to be carefully framed, as such preferences are often made solely to shift the business away from creditors rather than to keep the existing company going. Directors need a moratorium now for good reason but must not forget their statutory duties. Consultation with insolvency professionals now might save pain later.’

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll