header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Company directors given breathing space

30 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-detail
Insolvency lawyers have welcomed the government’s decision to suspend the wrongful trading law during the COVID-19 pandemic, but raised questions about preferential paying

Currently, directors of limited liability companies can become personally liable for business debts, under the Insolvency Act 1986, if they continue to trade while unable to pay their debts (wrongful trading). There does not need to be any fraudulent intent, only poor judgment or wishful thinking.

Last week, however, the government announced a package of measures for businesses, including suspending wrongful trading provisions for three months, backdated to 1 March, to protect company directors from the threat of personal liability.

Other measures include enabling companies either to hold AGMs online or postpone the meetings, and granting a three-month extension to the filing of company accounts. Business Secretary Alok Sharma said the measures would give bosses ‘much-needed breathing space to keep their workers employed and their companies going’.

Jennifer Marshall, president of the Insolvency Lawyers Association, said: ‘Suspending wrongful trading, in particular, will assist directors in accessing government or bank funding without concerns regarding personal liability.’

Frances Coulson, senior partner and head of insolvency at Moon Beever, said: ‘Everyone is banging on about wrongful trading but no one has really mentioned sanctioning the ability to preferentially pay suppliers.

‘Bad directors often make preferential payments to keep certain suppliers sweet so they transfer over to a newco, dumping other creditors, particularly involuntary creditors such as utilities and local councils as well as HMRC (until this December when HMRC will become a preferential creditor again).’

Coulson said the ‘well-intentioned’ suspension ‘won’t rescue long term abusers of credit, but will help cover the instant crisis.

‘The changes also look as if they will allow preferential payments to suppliers, in order to enable continuation of trading. This needs to be carefully framed, as such preferences are often made solely to shift the business away from creditors rather than to keep the existing company going. Directors need a moratorium now for good reason but must not forget their statutory duties. Consultation with insolvency professionals now might save pain later.’

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Richard Meers

Arc Pensions Law—Richard Meers

Pensions litigation team announces senior associate hire

Burges Salmon—Neil Demuth

Burges Salmon—Neil Demuth

Firm appoints new chief financial officer

Anthony Collins—Sue Bearman

Anthony Collins—Sue Bearman

Social purpose firm announces director hire plus eight promotions

NEWS
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Human rights lawyers, social justice champion, co-founder of the law firm Bindmans, and NLJ columnist Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC has died at the age of 92 years
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll