header-logo header-logo

12 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Could parliament go virtual?

Parliament should operate virtually, with MPs and Peers working remotely to scrutinise legislation and vote during the COVID-19 pandemic, an independent thinktank has urged

In a paper published last week, the Institute for Government (IfG) calls on Parliamentarians to use video links and speaking lists to continue work in the chamber and select committees. Proxy voting, which is already available to MPs on parental leave, should be expanded to reduce the need to travel to Westminster, it says.

The paper, ‘How could a virtual parliament work?’, also suggests that the government negotiate with opposition parties to re-establish the Liaison Committee or create a body similar to New Zealand’s Epidemic Response Committee to scrutinise the government’s response to COVID-19. The Liaison Committee is made up of all the select committee chairs and holds regular evidence sessions with the Prime Minister.

The government also needs to look into methods for digital voting, as used in other legislatures, as a matter of urgency, the thinktank says.

The paper calls on the government to legislate only where necessary during the pandemic.

Parliament rose a week early for its Easter break, on 25 March, and is due to return on 21 April. While MPs have been practising social distancing by sitting two metres away from each other on the benches, they are required to physically walk through division lobbies to register their votes.

Hannah White, the IfG’s deputy director and author of the report, said: ‘At this time of national crisis, parliament is central to ensuring that government continues to function and maintains public trust. Parliament must innovate to ensure it can continue operating―and be seen to do so―while protecting the health of MPs, peers and staff. That should include exploring options for the introduction of digital voting.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll