header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Could parliament go virtual?

12 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
Parliament should operate virtually, with MPs and Peers working remotely to scrutinise legislation and vote during the COVID-19 pandemic, an independent thinktank has urged

In a paper published last week, the Institute for Government (IfG) calls on Parliamentarians to use video links and speaking lists to continue work in the chamber and select committees. Proxy voting, which is already available to MPs on parental leave, should be expanded to reduce the need to travel to Westminster, it says.

The paper, ‘How could a virtual parliament work?’, also suggests that the government negotiate with opposition parties to re-establish the Liaison Committee or create a body similar to New Zealand’s Epidemic Response Committee to scrutinise the government’s response to COVID-19. The Liaison Committee is made up of all the select committee chairs and holds regular evidence sessions with the Prime Minister.

The government also needs to look into methods for digital voting, as used in other legislatures, as a matter of urgency, the thinktank says.

The paper calls on the government to legislate only where necessary during the pandemic.

Parliament rose a week early for its Easter break, on 25 March, and is due to return on 21 April. While MPs have been practising social distancing by sitting two metres away from each other on the benches, they are required to physically walk through division lobbies to register their votes.

Hannah White, the IfG’s deputy director and author of the report, said: ‘At this time of national crisis, parliament is central to ensuring that government continues to function and maintains public trust. Parliament must innovate to ensure it can continue operating―and be seen to do so―while protecting the health of MPs, peers and staff. That should include exploring options for the introduction of digital voting.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll