header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Financial help for solicitors & barristers

14 April 2020
Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail
Both barristers and solicitors may be experiencing financial difficulties due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, help is at hand.

The four Inns of Court together with the Barristers’ Benevolent Association (BBA) have set up an emergency fund to support barristers affected by the crisis. It aims to give financial assistance to those who have contracted the virus or those, particularly but not exclusively, at the publicly funded Bar, in financial difficulties because their work has been affected. To find out more, or donate, click here.

Chair of the Bar, Amanda Pinto QC said: ‘All four Inns are making a substantial donation to the BBA so, regardless of which one you belong to, this fund will help those barristers who are unable to support themselves and their families as a result of the current crisis.

‘This is an important and valuable initiative to help ensure that the Bar remains a strong and integral part of the justice system. Because of the seriousness of the situation, we expect demand for the BBA’s Covid-19 appeal to exceed what can be provided by the BBA, but the more donations those who can afford it make, the more people it will be able to help. The BBA can only help those who have held a brief, so each Inn will be providing separately for their members (such as very junior tenants and pupils) who are ineligible for this fund.’

Meanwhile, the Solicitors Benevolent Association (SBA), the charity for solicitors in need, has set up a COVID-19 Support Hub for solicitors affected by the coronavirus crisis. The SBA team is working remotely and can be contacted as usual 9am-5pm on weekdays. As well as providing grants and loans, SBA is a valuable source of advice and resources, including the latest updates on the coronavirus. Visit the SBA at www.sba.org.uk.

Recently released statistics for 2019 from the SBA showed the charity awarded £986,087 to solicitors and their families in need during the year, £821,249 in grants and £164,838 in interest-free loans. Among beneficiaries, 70% were aged 60 or under (15% were 40 years old or younger, 26% were aged 41-50 and 29% were aged 51-60).

Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll