header-logo header-logo

14 April 2020
Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Financial help for solicitors & barristers

Both barristers and solicitors may be experiencing financial difficulties due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, help is at hand.

The four Inns of Court together with the Barristers’ Benevolent Association (BBA) have set up an emergency fund to support barristers affected by the crisis. It aims to give financial assistance to those who have contracted the virus or those, particularly but not exclusively, at the publicly funded Bar, in financial difficulties because their work has been affected. To find out more, or donate, click here.

Chair of the Bar, Amanda Pinto QC said: ‘All four Inns are making a substantial donation to the BBA so, regardless of which one you belong to, this fund will help those barristers who are unable to support themselves and their families as a result of the current crisis.

‘This is an important and valuable initiative to help ensure that the Bar remains a strong and integral part of the justice system. Because of the seriousness of the situation, we expect demand for the BBA’s Covid-19 appeal to exceed what can be provided by the BBA, but the more donations those who can afford it make, the more people it will be able to help. The BBA can only help those who have held a brief, so each Inn will be providing separately for their members (such as very junior tenants and pupils) who are ineligible for this fund.’

Meanwhile, the Solicitors Benevolent Association (SBA), the charity for solicitors in need, has set up a COVID-19 Support Hub for solicitors affected by the coronavirus crisis. The SBA team is working remotely and can be contacted as usual 9am-5pm on weekdays. As well as providing grants and loans, SBA is a valuable source of advice and resources, including the latest updates on the coronavirus. Visit the SBA at www.sba.org.uk.

Recently released statistics for 2019 from the SBA showed the charity awarded £986,087 to solicitors and their families in need during the year, £821,249 in grants and £164,838 in interest-free loans. Among beneficiaries, 70% were aged 60 or under (15% were 40 years old or younger, 26% were aged 41-50 and 29% were aged 51-60).

Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll