header-logo header-logo

28 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Furlough & budget cuts at the Bar Council

The Bar Council has cut its budget and furloughed one in five of its staff in order to focus on supporting barristers through the pandemic
Both the Bar Council and Bar Standards Board (BSB) have implemented a pay and recruitment freeze, which makes a saving of £98,000 across the Bar Council and resources group, and £110,000 from the BSB. 

The chairs and vice-chairs of the Bar Council and BSB and the chief executive of the Bar Council and director general of the BSB have all taken a voluntary, temporary 20% pay cut.

Seven of the 35 employees at the Bar Council have been furloughed, as have six out of 41 employees in the resources group (the human resources and finance services team shared by the BSB and Bar Council).

The Pupillage Fair as well as training courses and other events will go ahead as online events. The Bar Council has also reviewed its business plans for representation, policy and services, and cut some planned work in order to save money and staff time.  

Malcolm Cree, chief executive of the Bar Council, said: ‘Right now, our focus is on supporting the profession we represent through this crisis. 

‘We have been working flat out to ensure that the vital public service and contribution to society and the economy that the Bar provides is recognised and supported. The scale of the challenge for practitioners and chambers must be addressed. 

‘As the Bar Council (including the BSB) is funded by the Bar, with fees based on earnings in the previous year, we are anticipating a significant drop in income next year, hence the need to cut costs early so we do not become a greater financial burden on those we are trying to support. Therefore, we have furloughed roles, frozen pay and recruitment and cut back our business plans.’

The Bar Council receives 27.9% of barristers’ practising certificate fees. The BSB takes 66.7% and the Legal Services Board and Legal ombudsman take 5.4%.

Cree said: ‘We are a very small organisation, which relies heavily on our dedicated staff and some 400 volunteer barristers, and punches well above our weight, but we know that we need to be as lean as possible, especially now.’

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
back-to-top-scroll