header-logo header-logo

03 August 2020
Issue: 7898 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Grants & schemes for lawyers

A committee of MPs has backed the Bar Council’s call for the Self-Employed Income Support Scheme to be extended to new and returning practitioners

In a report published this week, ‘Coronavirus (Covid-19): The impact on the legal professions in England and Wales’, the Justice Committee supports the use of evidence other than tax returns to be used for the scheme. Currently, only those who submitted a 2018-19 tax return are eligible.

The MPs also backed the Law Society’s proposals for monthly payments of criminal legal aid to law firms and not-for-profit providers, and postponement of repayments, and it recommended further government grants to law centres and not-for-profit legal services providers. It called on the MoJ to report back and state, if it chose not to provide grants, what provision it would make for users of those law centres that cease operations.

The committee heard evidence from the Law Centres Network that ‘if lost earnings are not replaced soon, Law Centres stand to lose £3m in earned income within six months and, having used up their already scant reserves, the half of them most reliant on legal aid income would face closure’.

The committee’s chair, Sir Robert Neill said: ‘I know some people won’t have a lot of sympathy for lawyers who dress up in fancy gowns and speak a language of their own.

‘People are under the misapprehension they are all on comfortable incomes. Some are, but very many, especially given their recent big drop in workload, are not.

‘The Ministry of Justice needs to consider further grants for those working in Law Centres and others in the not-for-profit Legal Aid sector. Otherwise, the next time a victim of a crime or a defendant – both of whom may be on modest incomes - has a brush with the legal system, they may find they have no access to real justice.’

Sir Bob also called on the MoJ to ‘set out how it will make sure that this pandemic does not disproportionately affect the incomes of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic, or state-educated, legal professionals’.

The Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland QC said: ‘I am working very hard, not just with the Treasury but internally, to see what more can be done to help the flow of regular income to the professions, particularly those at the sharp end of legal aid.’

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The Justice Committee made many constructive recommendations. Importantly, the committee recognises Covid-19’s disproportionate impact on BAME and state-educated legal professionals. We know the budget exists. The Lord Chancellor said he is working hard to help. If he fails, justice will regress to society’s detriment.’

Issue: 7898 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll