header-logo header-logo

03 August 2020
Issue: 7898 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Grants & schemes for lawyers

A committee of MPs has backed the Bar Council’s call for the Self-Employed Income Support Scheme to be extended to new and returning practitioners

In a report published this week, ‘Coronavirus (Covid-19): The impact on the legal professions in England and Wales’, the Justice Committee supports the use of evidence other than tax returns to be used for the scheme. Currently, only those who submitted a 2018-19 tax return are eligible.

The MPs also backed the Law Society’s proposals for monthly payments of criminal legal aid to law firms and not-for-profit providers, and postponement of repayments, and it recommended further government grants to law centres and not-for-profit legal services providers. It called on the MoJ to report back and state, if it chose not to provide grants, what provision it would make for users of those law centres that cease operations.

The committee heard evidence from the Law Centres Network that ‘if lost earnings are not replaced soon, Law Centres stand to lose £3m in earned income within six months and, having used up their already scant reserves, the half of them most reliant on legal aid income would face closure’.

The committee’s chair, Sir Robert Neill said: ‘I know some people won’t have a lot of sympathy for lawyers who dress up in fancy gowns and speak a language of their own.

‘People are under the misapprehension they are all on comfortable incomes. Some are, but very many, especially given their recent big drop in workload, are not.

‘The Ministry of Justice needs to consider further grants for those working in Law Centres and others in the not-for-profit Legal Aid sector. Otherwise, the next time a victim of a crime or a defendant – both of whom may be on modest incomes - has a brush with the legal system, they may find they have no access to real justice.’

Sir Bob also called on the MoJ to ‘set out how it will make sure that this pandemic does not disproportionately affect the incomes of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic, or state-educated, legal professionals’.

The Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland QC said: ‘I am working very hard, not just with the Treasury but internally, to see what more can be done to help the flow of regular income to the professions, particularly those at the sharp end of legal aid.’

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The Justice Committee made many constructive recommendations. Importantly, the committee recognises Covid-19’s disproportionate impact on BAME and state-educated legal professionals. We know the budget exists. The Lord Chancellor said he is working hard to help. If he fails, justice will regress to society’s detriment.’

Issue: 7898 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
back-to-top-scroll