header-logo header-logo

28 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Hospitality group action

A group action for tens of millions of pounds could be brought by the hospitality sector to hold insurance companies to account for policy payouts for losses arising from lockdown and COVID-19

Mishcon de Reya is advising the Hospitality Insurance Group Action (HIGA), which launched this week, on bringing an action against a range of insurers. The firm has secured funding to cover the policy review exercise and is working with Philip Edey QC, of Twenty Essex Chambers. Any subsequent claim will be funded by third party funders.

According to HIGA, some businesses with broader policy wordings may wrongly have been told they are not covered.

The action will be open to hotels, restaurants, bars, pubs, nightclubs and leisure businesses forced to close and whose insurance company is silent or refusing to honour policies relating to business interruption due to the pandemic.

There is no cost to any UK hospitality business to register with HIGA and have Mishcon review their insurance policy. The firm aims to review all participants’ policies by the end of May.

Mishcon partner Sonia Campbell, who will lead the action, said: ‘Hospitality sector businesses, large and small, have been particularly hard hit by the government-enforced closure during this pandemic and desperately need to mitigate their losses.

‘In times of crisis they expect their insurance to respond. Yet I am hearing time and time again that insurers are either stone-walling, unfairly limiting or simply point-blank refusing to pay out under business interruption policies.

‘This strikes us as something that is open to challenge. I look forward to assisting all members of HIGA in exploring the possibility of a group claim. There may well be some light at the end of this industry’s very dark tunnel.’ 

Businesses will be eligible if their policy includes non-physical damage extensions to cover and is governed by English law, whether they are customers of Axa, China Taiping, RSA, Touchstone, Zurich or any other insurance provider. More information is available at www.HIGAction.com. A separate group has been set up for Hiscox policyholders, which Mishcon is also advising. The Hiscox Action Group can be found at https://hiscoxactiongroup.org.

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll