header-logo header-logo

14 April 2020
Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Is your court open, staffed or suspended?

The Law Society has produced an interactive map to help solicitors and members of the public find out which courts are operational during the COVID-19 pandemic

This follows Ministry of Justice action to consolidate courts and tribunals into fewer buildings to make best use of resources and help prevent the spread of the coronavirus. 

The interactive heat map will be updated as more data becomes available.

Simon Davis, President of the Law Society said: ‘This tool illustrates which courts and tribunals buildings continue to be operational.

‘Where appropriate steps are taken to ensure good hygiene, appropriate distancing, and compliance with all other relevant guidance to minimise risk, they should be safe to attend.’

There are 160 court buildings open to the public for essential face-to-face hearings. A further 116 staffed courts are open to justice system employees and judges but not to the public, with parties involved in hearings accessing proceedings remotely via video or telephone. 75 courts have been closed temporarily.

Davis said: ‘The question will inevitably arise to what extent we can, or even should, return wholesale to previous ways of working once this crisis subsides.

‘The reality is that such a profound shift will likely alter permanently how we uphold justice and the rule of law. Therefore we must monitor carefully which of the technological solutions are sustainable for the long-term, to ensure that increases in efficiencies do not inadvertently come at the expense of justice being not only done but seen to be done.

 ‘Courts must be able to re-open once this crisis abates. We must be wary to avoid any risk of significant and permanent damage to the public’s ability to access to justice.’

In addition to the heat map, practitioners can look at HM Courts and Tribunals tracker list for the latest information on which courts are open, staffed and suspended. Find it at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/courts-and-tribunals-tracker-list-during-coronavirus-outbreak.

For contact details and information about courts and tribunals in your area, go to: https://www.gov.uk/find-court-tribunal.

For advice and guidance for court and tribunal users during the pandemic, visit: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus-covid-19-courts-and-tribunals-planning-and-preparation.

Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll