header-logo header-logo

14 April 2020
Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Is your court open, staffed or suspended?

The Law Society has produced an interactive map to help solicitors and members of the public find out which courts are operational during the COVID-19 pandemic

This follows Ministry of Justice action to consolidate courts and tribunals into fewer buildings to make best use of resources and help prevent the spread of the coronavirus. 

The interactive heat map will be updated as more data becomes available.

Simon Davis, President of the Law Society said: ‘This tool illustrates which courts and tribunals buildings continue to be operational.

‘Where appropriate steps are taken to ensure good hygiene, appropriate distancing, and compliance with all other relevant guidance to minimise risk, they should be safe to attend.’

There are 160 court buildings open to the public for essential face-to-face hearings. A further 116 staffed courts are open to justice system employees and judges but not to the public, with parties involved in hearings accessing proceedings remotely via video or telephone. 75 courts have been closed temporarily.

Davis said: ‘The question will inevitably arise to what extent we can, or even should, return wholesale to previous ways of working once this crisis subsides.

‘The reality is that such a profound shift will likely alter permanently how we uphold justice and the rule of law. Therefore we must monitor carefully which of the technological solutions are sustainable for the long-term, to ensure that increases in efficiencies do not inadvertently come at the expense of justice being not only done but seen to be done.

 ‘Courts must be able to re-open once this crisis abates. We must be wary to avoid any risk of significant and permanent damage to the public’s ability to access to justice.’

In addition to the heat map, practitioners can look at HM Courts and Tribunals tracker list for the latest information on which courts are open, staffed and suspended. Find it at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/courts-and-tribunals-tracker-list-during-coronavirus-outbreak.

For contact details and information about courts and tribunals in your area, go to: https://www.gov.uk/find-court-tribunal.

For advice and guidance for court and tribunal users during the pandemic, visit: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus-covid-19-courts-and-tribunals-planning-and-preparation.

Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll