header-logo header-logo

29 April 2020
Issue: 7885 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Key worker solicitors can get tests

Solicitors, barristers and other legal professionals who are key workers are eligible for COVID-19 testing, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has confirmed

Simon Davis, president of the Law Society, said: ‘Solicitors with essential roles which put them at risk of infection will welcome their inclusion in the testing programme.

‘However, there are still significant areas for improvement. We will continue to raise the implications COVID-19 is having on the legal profession with government and key stakeholders to ensure all solicitors can carry out their vital work for society as safely as possible during the current outbreak.’

Applications for the test can be made at: https://self-referral.test-for-coronavirus.service.gov.uk/eligibility.

According to MoJ guidance, those ‘essential to the running of the justice system’ are key workers. The MoJ has clarified that this includes advocates (including solicitor advocates) required to appear before a court or tribunal (remotely or in person), including prosecutors; duty solicitors; solicitors, legal executives, barristers, paralegals and others working on imminent or ongoing hearings; solicitors working on wills; and solicitors and barristers advising people living in institutions or deprived of their liberty.

Issue: 7885 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll