header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Protocol regarding remote hearings

23 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
Judges have been issued with guidance on how to conduct remote hearings, to assist with civil justice in the time of COVID-19

‘Protocol regarding remote hearings’, published by the judiciary of England and Wales on 20 March, is a four-page document applicable to hearings of all kinds, including trials, applications and those in which litigants in person are involved in the county court, High Court and Court of Appeal, including the business and property courts. The guidance says it ‘should be applied flexibly’.

While it is ‘inevitable that undertaking numerous hearings remotely will cause teething troubles’, all parties are ‘urged to be sympathetic to the technological and other difficulties experienced by others’.

The protocol sets out legal issues to be addressed before the hearing begins, including how it is to be recorded and how it can be made public, for example, through live streaming or by allowing accredited journalists to log in to the remote hearing. The protocol states: ‘The principle of open justice remains paramount.’

It addresses what should happen once a hearing is fixed, the preparation for it and the procedure.

Parties are asked to keep their court bundles concise. It states: ‘Electronic bundles should contain only documents and authorities that are essential to the remote hearing. Large electronic files can be slow to transmit and unwieldy to use.’

See the protocol at: www.judiciary.uk/publications/civil-court-guidance-on-how-to-conduct-remote-hearings.

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll