header-logo header-logo

CPD freedom for barristers

04 June 2015
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Barristers would be freed from continuing professional development (CPD) obligations under the Bar Standards Board (BSB) latest proposals for legal education and training. 

In a consultation paper launched this week as part of the BSB's Future Bar Training programme, the BSB proposes replacing the Established Practitioners Programme with a new CPD scheme that lets barristers choose their own CPD programme, and abolishing the requirement that practitioners must complete 12 hours of CPD each year.

Simon Thornton-Wood, the BSB’s director of education and training, says: “We think barristers are best placed to map out and embark on the training most useful to their own career path. 

“CPD should be about barristers enriching their perspectives, challenging and colliding ideas, and acquiring knowledge that will help them provide their clients with the best service possible. It shouldn't be a last minute scramble to attend the next available course, whatever it is, just to clock up a chosen number of hours.”

The consultation can be here, and closes on 2 September 2015.

 

Issue: 7656 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll