header-logo header-logo

23 April 2009
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A CPR celebration at the RCJ

Green Book launch marks a decade of the Woolf Reforms

LexisNexis marked the 10th anniversary of the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) and the publication of this year’s edition of The Civil Court Practice with a double celebration at the Royal Courts of Justice (RCJ) on Tuesday evening.

Nicky Briggs, publishing and editorial director at LexisNexis, said that 10 years ago almost to the day (26 April 1999) the content of The Civil Court Practice, known affectionately as The Green Book, had changed fundamentally when the CPR fused the High Court and county court systems.

She added that the publication had “continued to move with the times to ensure it was the most incisive and relevant civil procedure text available”. Innovations for this year’s edition include full coverage of the new Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct and an exclusive supplement on the new Supreme Court which will replace the House of Lords in October.

Lord Neuberger, editorin- chief of The Civil Court Practice, said it was a good time to “take stock” of the Woolf Reforms, and that they should be commended for the introduction of judicial case management and the new disclosure regime.

To mark the 10-year anniversary LexisNexis has recently hosted—and filmed—a debate with Lord Neuberger as chairman. Sir Anthony Clarke MR, Simon Davis, litigation partner at Cliff ord Chance, District Judge Michael Walker, and Professor Michael Zander QC debated the success, or otherwise, of the Woolf reforms.

Attendees at Tuesday’s event were given a digital version of the debate to take away with them and an online copy will be circulated via email to LexisNexis subscribers on the anniversary next week.

Aptly for the evening’s events, the RCJ was lit up in green to mark the launch of The Green Book. “This is the first time this ‘white’ building has gone green,” said Kate Pamphilon, a senior developer at LexisNexis. “And we hope to see much more green within the walls of the RCJ going forward…”.

Issue: 7366 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Newcastle & North of England Law Society—Lesley Fairclough

Newcastle & North of England Law Society—Lesley Fairclough

Ward Hadaway partner becomes bicentennial president following regional merger

Devonshires—four promotions

Devonshires—four promotions

Firm promotes four senior associates to partner in annual round

Fieldfisher—John McElroy & Daniel Hayward

Fieldfisher—John McElroy & Daniel Hayward

Co-heads of dispute resolution practice appointed alongside partner promotions

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll