header-logo header-logo

A CPR celebration at the RCJ

23 April 2009
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Green Book launch marks a decade of the Woolf Reforms

LexisNexis marked the 10th anniversary of the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) and the publication of this year’s edition of The Civil Court Practice with a double celebration at the Royal Courts of Justice (RCJ) on Tuesday evening.

Nicky Briggs, publishing and editorial director at LexisNexis, said that 10 years ago almost to the day (26 April 1999) the content of The Civil Court Practice, known affectionately as The Green Book, had changed fundamentally when the CPR fused the High Court and county court systems.

She added that the publication had “continued to move with the times to ensure it was the most incisive and relevant civil procedure text available”. Innovations for this year’s edition include full coverage of the new Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct and an exclusive supplement on the new Supreme Court which will replace the House of Lords in October.

Lord Neuberger, editorin- chief of The Civil Court Practice, said it was a good time to “take stock” of the Woolf Reforms, and that they should be commended for the introduction of judicial case management and the new disclosure regime.

To mark the 10-year anniversary LexisNexis has recently hosted—and filmed—a debate with Lord Neuberger as chairman. Sir Anthony Clarke MR, Simon Davis, litigation partner at Cliff ord Chance, District Judge Michael Walker, and Professor Michael Zander QC debated the success, or otherwise, of the Woolf reforms.

Attendees at Tuesday’s event were given a digital version of the debate to take away with them and an online copy will be circulated via email to LexisNexis subscribers on the anniversary next week.

Aptly for the evening’s events, the RCJ was lit up in green to mark the launch of The Green Book. “This is the first time this ‘white’ building has gone green,” said Kate Pamphilon, a senior developer at LexisNexis. “And we hope to see much more green within the walls of the RCJ going forward…”.

Issue: 7366 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll