header-logo header-logo

23 April 2009
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A CPR celebration at the RCJ

Green Book launch marks a decade of the Woolf Reforms

LexisNexis marked the 10th anniversary of the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) and the publication of this year’s edition of The Civil Court Practice with a double celebration at the Royal Courts of Justice (RCJ) on Tuesday evening.

Nicky Briggs, publishing and editorial director at LexisNexis, said that 10 years ago almost to the day (26 April 1999) the content of The Civil Court Practice, known affectionately as The Green Book, had changed fundamentally when the CPR fused the High Court and county court systems.

She added that the publication had “continued to move with the times to ensure it was the most incisive and relevant civil procedure text available”. Innovations for this year’s edition include full coverage of the new Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct and an exclusive supplement on the new Supreme Court which will replace the House of Lords in October.

Lord Neuberger, editorin- chief of The Civil Court Practice, said it was a good time to “take stock” of the Woolf Reforms, and that they should be commended for the introduction of judicial case management and the new disclosure regime.

To mark the 10-year anniversary LexisNexis has recently hosted—and filmed—a debate with Lord Neuberger as chairman. Sir Anthony Clarke MR, Simon Davis, litigation partner at Cliff ord Chance, District Judge Michael Walker, and Professor Michael Zander QC debated the success, or otherwise, of the Woolf reforms.

Attendees at Tuesday’s event were given a digital version of the debate to take away with them and an online copy will be circulated via email to LexisNexis subscribers on the anniversary next week.

Aptly for the evening’s events, the RCJ was lit up in green to mark the launch of The Green Book. “This is the first time this ‘white’ building has gone green,” said Kate Pamphilon, a senior developer at LexisNexis. “And we hope to see much more green within the walls of the RCJ going forward…”.

Issue: 7366 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll