header-logo header-logo

12 October 2012 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7533 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Cracking the meaning

79711390_4

Andrew Francis examines the risks involved in construing the wording of legal documents

Two recent authorities have demonstrated the risks encountered by clients, advisers and draftsmen when construing the words used in legal documents. In one case, the document containing the crucial words was, at the time of the judgment, just seven days past its 45th birthday. In the other case, the document in question was less than three years old at the time of the judgment at trial and just less than four years old at the time of the judgments delivered by the Court of Appeal.

Both demonstrate the wisdom shown by Humpty Dumpty in Alice Through the Looking-Glass where he said first: “When I use a word...it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” And where he then said: “The question is...which is to be master—that’s all.”

Two cases in search of an answer

In this article, the two cases below will show how the intention of the parties to documents and the principles

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll