header-logo header-logo

Cracking the meaning

12 October 2012 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7533 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
79711390_4

Andrew Francis examines the risks involved in construing the wording of legal documents

Two recent authorities have demonstrated the risks encountered by clients, advisers and draftsmen when construing the words used in legal documents. In one case, the document containing the crucial words was, at the time of the judgment, just seven days past its 45th birthday. In the other case, the document in question was less than three years old at the time of the judgment at trial and just less than four years old at the time of the judgments delivered by the Court of Appeal.

Both demonstrate the wisdom shown by Humpty Dumpty in Alice Through the Looking-Glass where he said first: “When I use a word...it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” And where he then said: “The question is...which is to be master—that’s all.”

Two cases in search of an answer

In this article, the two cases below will show how the intention of the parties to documents and the principles

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll