header-logo header-logo

Cracking the meaning

12 October 2012 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7533 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
79711390_4

Andrew Francis examines the risks involved in construing the wording of legal documents

Two recent authorities have demonstrated the risks encountered by clients, advisers and draftsmen when construing the words used in legal documents. In one case, the document containing the crucial words was, at the time of the judgment, just seven days past its 45th birthday. In the other case, the document in question was less than three years old at the time of the judgment at trial and just less than four years old at the time of the judgments delivered by the Court of Appeal.

Both demonstrate the wisdom shown by Humpty Dumpty in Alice Through the Looking-Glass where he said first: “When I use a word...it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” And where he then said: “The question is...which is to be master—that’s all.”

Two cases in search of an answer

In this article, the two cases below will show how the intention of the parties to documents and the principles

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll