header-logo header-logo

18 May 2012 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Family
printer mail-detail

Cracks in the system

Late changes will not be enough to soften the blow of pending change for vulnerable clients, says Jon Robins

Now the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (LASPO) has reached the statute book after some 18 long months of lobbying and campaigning, what ground have the ministers given? LASPO was “an attack on poor people, the vulnerable and disabled: the people who cannot answer back”, Lord Bach said last month as the then Bill completed its passage through Parliament.

Bill bashing

LASPO received an unprecedented bashing at the hands of peers. I spoke to Lord Bach in the House of Lords’ canteen immediately after the final debate. Lord David Pannick had that afternoon told fellow peers that the Bill had been made “marginally better” by amendments (and would have been “marginally better” still had Pannick’s own amendment establishing access to justice as a constitutional principle been accepted). It remained “a bad Bill”, he said.

Lord Bach said that there were parts of the Legal Aid Act (those

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll