header-logo header-logo

21 June 2007
Issue: 7278 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

CRIME AND PUNISHMENT

In brief

The government wants to establish how effective s 58 of the Children Act 2004 has been in improving legal protection for children in cases of alleged assault by their parents. Views are being sought from parents and those working with children and families on the practical consequences of the changes in the law brought about by the provision, which came into force in January 2005. Section 58 limits the availability of the “reasonable punishment” defence in cases involving alleged assaults by parents on their children. The consultation will run for eight weeks, with a report expected in the autumn. It is available at the Department for Education and Skills website: www.dfes.gov.uk.

Issue: 7278 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Paula Myers to private capital team in Leeds

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces five promotions at Birmingham office

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll