header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
07 April 2023 / David Walbank KC
Issue: 8020 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal , Rule of law , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Crime brief: 7 & 14 April 2023

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
117936
The Supreme Court has warned that those on the losing side of a political debate should not then resort to undermining legislation: David Walbank KC reports
  • Abortion services in Northern Ireland.
  • Legislative competence of Northern Ireland Assembly.
  • Respect for democratic process and rule of law.

We live in lawless times. However, today's ‘outlaws’ are not just the usual rogues’ gallery of murderers, rapists, thieves and fraudsters. It sometimes seems that the spirit of lawlessness has infected our ruling classes, with ministers and parliamentarians talking with abandon about flouting the law of the land or breaking international law. Indeed, the Supreme Court has recently bemoaned the fact that on occasion nowadays ‘those in public office are not prepared to comply with their legal obligations because they disagree with the relevant law’ ([2022] UKSC 32).

Legislative manoeuvres

The background to Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland—Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill [2022] UKSC 32, [2022] All ER (D) 25 (Dec)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll