header-logo header-logo

Crime Brief

04 October 2007 / Andrew Keogh
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Features , CPR
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES

The Law Society has published a practice note detailing solicitors’ duties under the Criminal Procedure Rules (CrimPR). The purpose of the practice note is to provide assistance to the profession in seeking to define the extent of duties and burdens under the rules, and to identify and address the ethical problems that are likely to arise from their imposition. It examines the following: (i) the solicitor’s duty to the court; (ii) the solicitor, the client and the court, “a divided loyalty”; (iii) the CrimPR; and (iv) the approach of the court towards solicitors under CrimPR (see www.lawsociety.org.uk).

Rule amendments

The second amendment to the CrimPR 2005 was implemented on 1 October 2007. The following changes are made:
- A new Pt 65 (appeal to the Court of Appeal: general rules), in substitution for the existing Pt 65 (appeal to the Court of Appeal against ruling in preparatory hearing). The rules that relate to an appeal against a ruling in a preparatory hearing are found in the new Pt 66.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll