header-logo header-logo

Crime brief

07 June 2007
Issue: 7276 / Categories: Case law , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Sentencing sex offences
Kidnapping and deprivation of liberty
Sentencing terrorism offences
Youths: when is a crime grave?
Extradition—when warrants conflict
Doli incapax: Alive and well?
Parole: timing and compensation

Sexual Offences Act 2003: Definitive Sentencing Guidelines

The Sentencing Guidelines Council has issued definitive guidelines for offences under the Sexual Offences Act 2003. It is the duty of every court to “have regard” to the guidelines (Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003), s172 ). The guidelines apply to all defendants sentenced on or after 14 May 2007 irrespective of when the offence was committed. The guidelines make clear that there is to be no distinction in relation to penalties for male and female defendants (with the obvious exception of primary offenders in rape cases), and that the gender of the victim will, in most cases, be irrelevant.

Assessing seriousness

The court will consider three factors when assessing the seriousness of the offence: degree of harm to the victim; level of offender’s culpability; and the risk posed to society by the offender.

Harm caused

Courts need to be careful to recognise that harm may

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll