header-logo header-logo

06 June 2025 / David Walbank KC
Issue: 8119 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal , Media
printer mail-detail

Crime brief: 6 June 2025

221393
Can a retrial be fair when a conviction has been at the centre of a media storm? David Walbank KC considers the Lucy Letby case
  • Trial for murder and attempted murder.
  • Media comment after guilty verdicts.
  • Fairness of retrial.

Rarely in modern English criminal history can charges of murder most foul have generated so many column inches or such lurid headlines as in the case of Lucy Letby. The acres of coverage in the print media are matched only by the constant replaying on our television screens of the bodycam footage showing the moments after her arrest. And that is nothing when compared with the deluge of analysis, comment and speculation that continues to engulf social media.

It is not hard to see why. If Lucy Letby did what she is accused of, can there ever have been a more merciless campaign of indiscriminate killing, waged by the very person to whom those poor, defenceless infants and their grief-stricken parents were entitled to look for care

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll