header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Crime brief: 12 August 2022

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
12 August 2022 / David Walbank KC
Issue: 7991 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-detail
90408
David Walbank QC examines a tragic case which underlines the polycentric decision-making process for offences involving young persons
  • Victims’ Right to Review scheme.
  • Charging decisions involving young persons.

We live in an era when decision-making throughout the criminal justice system is ever more hedged about by guidelines, protocols, codes of practice and the like. Whether it be grounds for arrest, charging decisions, legal directions to the jury, sentencing parameters or Parole Board reviews, the exercise of discretion is constrained like never before. It is against that background that the Divisional Court recently struck a blow for common sense and compassion when it comes to the laying of serious criminal charges against young persons.

In R (on the application of Joseph) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2022] EWHC 131 (Admin), [2022] All ER (D) 96 (Jan), Popplewell LJ referred to what he called the ‘polycentric’ decision-making process when considering the possible criminal prosecution of a young person, and also explained the approach to be taken where there is a tension

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Motor commissions & fiduciary duties
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
NLJ this week: The power of Interpol red notices
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Approach with caution post-Mazur
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Philip Sales is selected as next Deputy President
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Tax shock ahead for partners?
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll