header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 June 2017
Issue: 7750 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Criminal

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

R (Health and Safety Executive) v Tata Steel UK Ltd [2017] EWCA Crim 704, [2017] All ER (D) 32 (Jun)

The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, allowed the defendant company’s (Tata Steel UK Ltd) appeal against sentence for two offences comprising breaches of s 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, contrary to s 33(1)(A) thereof. Accordingly, the defendant’s sentence to pay a total fine of £1.985m was reduced to £1.5m.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Speechlive LogoClick to know more
Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

Twenty Essex—Thomas Hibbs, Jack Hollingworth & Sam Pearce

Twenty Essex—Thomas Hibbs, Jack Hollingworth & Sam Pearce

Three new tenants join Twenty Essex

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Auditors tighten the disclosure screws
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
NLJ this week: Telecoms tenants caught in a legal gap
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
NLJ this week: Due process holds the line

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

NLJ this week: Credit law’s regulatory reset
Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
NLJ this week: Employment law’s four-point check
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll