header-logo header-logo

02 March 2022
Issue: 7969 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Criminal Bar could refuse returns from next month

Barristers to vote on no returns policy

Ballot papers have been issued to criminal barristers, asking them to vote on a ‘no returns’ policy from 11 April.

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) set out the two options for its members this week. ‘Returns’ are where another barrister takes over the case if there’s a diary clash. The ballot ends at one minute to midnight on 11 March.

Option A is to refuse all return work under the advocates graduated fee scheme (AGFS) from 11 April, unless the government agrees to: a 25% per annum increase in remuneration under the AGFS; pay for written work as recommended by the Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid (CLAR); create an effective pay review body; expedite the timetable for consultation on the CLAR recommendations; pay a second brief fee payment for s 28 YJCE hearings; and index link AGFS payments.

Option B is to wait for the government’s response on CLAR in the week of 14 March, followed by a consultation until end of June 2022, and any relevant statutory instruments being implemented by end of September.

The CLAR recommended an increase of at least 15% in fees.

A survey of CBA members in January found 94% in favour of action if the government did not set out its proposals to expedite reform by 14 February. However, this was ‘simply ignored’ by the government.

Jo Sidhu QC, CBA chair, said: ‘The overall timetable for the reform of criminal legal aid funding set by government takes us to October 2022 with no prospect of an increase in fees until 2024.

‘Neither criminal barristers nor criminal solicitors can afford to wait that long. We have already paid a heavy price in attrition from our ranks for the inexcusable failure to deal post-haste with the impact of diminishing real incomes, and we are both facing decimation if critical intervention is not forthcoming.’
Issue: 7969 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll